Communication Prototype for Post-Stroke Patients Using Electrooculography (EOG)

  • Ukhti Alifah Aulia Rakhma Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
  • Erika Loniza
  • Wisnu Kartika
Keywords: Post Stroke, Communication, EOG, MaM Sense

Abstract

The background of this prototype is meant for post-stroke patients who have difficulties owing to trouble completing daily activities, particularly speaking with others. They have trouble communicating, which reduces their quality of life after a stroke. The goal of developing novel communication aids for post-stroke patients is to make it easier for post-stroke patients to communicate with caretakers. Electrooculography (EOG) signals generated by the movement of the eye muscles during eye glances collected by the MaM Sense sensor are employed in post-stroke communication aids. The microcontroller processes the method's command signal, which is subsequently displayed on a 20 x 4 Character LCD. For the four communications utilized, the MaM Sense sensor reading was successful 80.5% of the time. Thus, communication tools for post-stroke patients can help them communicate while also assisting caretakers in understanding the patient's wants. Improvements will be made in the design and wireless technologies for EOG signal recovery in the future.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

P. Phienphanich et al., “Automatic Stroke Screening on Mobile Application: Features of Gyroscope and Accelerometer for Arm Factor in FAST,” Proc. Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. EMBS, pp. 4225–4228, 2019, doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2019.8857550.

C. O. Johnson et al., “Global, regional, and national burden of stroke, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016,” Lancet Neurol., vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 439–458, 2019, doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30034-1.

I. Surakka et al., “Multi-ancestry meta-analysis identifies 5 novel loci for ischemic stroke and reveals heterogeneity of effects between sexes and ancestries,” Cell Genomics, vol. 3, no. 8, p. 100345, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xgen.2023.100345.

B. Michel, “Post-stroke depression and changes in behavior and personality,” Arch. Depress. Anxiety, vol. 4, pp. 031–033, 2018, doi: 10.17352/2455-5460.000031.

K. B. Jimenez et al., “AACstive Touchpad: An Electronic Augmentative and Alternative Communication Touchpad for Post-Stroke Aphasic Patients Basic Support,” Proc. 2023 17th Int. Conf. Ubiquitous Inf. Manag. Commun. IMCOM 2023, pp. 1–6, 2023, doi: 10.1109/IMCOM56909.2023.10035541.

M. Hoffmann and R. Chen, “The spectrum of aphasia subtypes and etiology in subacute stroke,” J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis., vol. 22, no. 8, pp. 1385–1392, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2013.04.017.

F. Daria, P. Elena, P. Galina, M. Olga, T. Alina, and B. Vladislav, “The influence of lesion volume, cortex thickness and lesion localization on chronic post-stroke aphasia severity,” 2019 IEEE Symp. Ser. Comput. Intell. SSCI 2019, pp. 541–549, 2019, doi: 10.1109/SSCI44817.2019.9002800.

Y. Wang, R. Behroozmand, L. P. Johnson, and J. Fridriksson, “Topology Highlights Neural Deficits of Post-Stroke Aphasia Patients,” Proc. - Int. Symp. Biomed. Imaging, vol. 2020-April, pp. 754–757, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ISBI45749.2020.9098734.

J. Ren et al., “Personalized functional imaging-guided rTMS on the superior frontal gyrus for post-stroke aphasia: A randomized sham-controlled trial,” Brain Stimul., vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 1313–1321, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2023.08.023.

K. R. Jothi, S. S. Sivaraju, and P. J. Yawalkar, “AI based Speech Language Therapy using Speech Quality Parameters for Aphasia Person: A Comprehensive Review,” Proc. 4th Int. Conf. Electron. Commun. Aerosp. Technol. ICECA 2020, pp. 1263–1271, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ICECA49313.2020.9297591.

N. Castro, W. D. Hula, and S. A. Ashaie, “Defining aphasia: Content analysis of six aphasia diagnostic batteries,” Cortex, vol. 166, pp. 19–32, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2023.05.005.

S. Martini, D. A. Setia Ningrum, K. H. Abdul-Mumin, and C. Yi-Li, “Assessing quality of life and associated factors in post-stroke patients using the world health organization abbreviated generic quality of life questionnaire (WHOQOL-BREF),” Clin. Epidemiol. Glob. Heal., vol. 13, no. December 2021, p. 100941, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.cegh.2021.100941.

Y. Zhu et al., “Resourcefulness as a mediator in the relationship between self-perceived burden and depression among the young and middle-aged stroke patients: A cross-sectional study,” Heliyon, vol. 9, no. 8, p. e18908, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18908.

H. Lee, Y. Lee, H. Choi, and S. B. Pyun, “Community integration and quality of life in aphasia after stroke,” Yonsei Med. J., vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 1694–1702, 2015, doi: 10.3349/ymj.2015.56.6.1694.

N. Klinjun, J. Suwanno, K. Srisomthrong, J. Suwanno, and M. Kelly, “A psychometrics evaluation of the Thai version of Caregiver Contribution to Self-Care of Chronic Illness Inventory Version 2 in stroke caregivers,” Int. J. Nurs. Sci., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 456–467, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2023.09.021.

A. Das et al., “Smart glove for sign language communications,” 2016 Int. Conf. Access. to Digit. World, ICADW 2016 - Proc., pp. 27–31, 2016, doi: 10.1109/ICADW.2016.7942508.

X. J. Ding and Z. Lv, “Design and development of an EOG-based simplified Chinese eye-writing system,” Biomed. Signal Process. Control, vol. 57, p. 101767, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.bspc.2019.101767.

Q. Huang et al., “An EOG-based human-machine interface for wheelchair control,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 65, no. 9, pp. 2023–2032, 2018, doi: 10.1109/TBME.2017.2732479.

N. Barbara, T. A. Camilleri, and K. P. Camilleri, “A comparison of EOG baseline drift mitigation techniques,” Biomed. Signal Process. Control, vol. 57, p. 101738, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.bspc.2019.101738.

Kwame A and Petrucka P, “A literature-based study of patient-centered care and communication in nurse-patient interactions : barriers , facilitators , and the way forward. BMC Nursing [revista en Internet] 2021 [acceso 2 de setiembre de 2023]; 20:158.,” pp. 1–10, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8414690/

P. Zhang, M. Ito, S. I. Ito, and M. Fukumi, “Implementation of EOG mouse using learning vector quantization and EOG-feature based methods,” Proc. - 2013 IEEE Conf. Syst. Process Control. ICSPC 2013, no. December, pp. 88–92, 2013, doi: 10.1109/SPC.2013.6735109.

E. F. Savastaer and C. Tepe, “Single Channel EOG Measurement System and Interface Design,” ISMSIT 2021 - 5th Int. Symp. Multidiscip. Stud. Innov. Technol. Proc., pp. 115–119, 2021, doi: 10.1109/ISMSIT52890.2021.9604601.

H. Manabe, M. Fukumoto, and T. Yagi, “Direct gaze estimation based on nonlinearity of EOG,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 1553–1562, 2015, doi: 10.1109/TBME.2015.2394409.

L. A. Frem-Sosa et al., “Design and characterization of an EOG signal acquisition system based on the programming of saccadic movement routines,” pp. 1–5, 2023, doi: 10.1109/isie51358.2023.10227919.

A. Jaramillo-Gonzalez et al., “A dataset of EEG and EOG from an auditory EOG-based communication system for patients in locked-in state,” Sci. Data, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2021, doi: 10.1038/s41597-020-00789-4.

C. Belkhiria, A. Boudir, C. Hurter, and V. Peysakhovich, “EOG-Based Human–Computer Interface: 2000–2020 Review,” Sensors, vol. 22, no. 13, pp. 1–19, 2022, doi: 10.3390/s22134914.

L. Yavuz and O. Demirci, MaM Sense (All in One Bio Sensor including Electromyography EMG, Electrocardiography ECG and Electrooculography EOG Sensor). 2022.

MaM High Tech, “All in one Sensor MaM Sense.” Barbaros, Abdullah Gül Ünv. Sk, 38100 Kocasinan/Kayseri, Turki, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.mamhightech.com/portfolio/mam-sense-eog-emg-ecg-sensor/

M. F. Bhuyain, M. A. U. Kabir Shawon, N. Sakib, T. Faruk, M. K. Islam, and K. M. Salim, “Design and development of an EOG-based system to control electric wheelchair for people suffering from Quadriplegia or Quadriparesis,” 1st Int. Conf. Robot. Electr. Signal Process. Tech. ICREST 2019, pp. 460–465, 2019, doi: 10.1109/ICREST.2019.8644378.

M. Babiuch, P. Foltynek, and P. Smutny, “Using the ESP32 microcontroller for data processing,” Proc. 2019 20th Int. Carpathian Control Conf. ICCC 2019, pp. 1–6, 2019, doi: 10.1109/CarpathianCC.2019.8765944.

Published
2024-02-12
How to Cite
[1]
U. A. Aulia Rakhma, E. Loniza, and W. Kartika, “Communication Prototype for Post-Stroke Patients Using Electrooculography (EOG)”, Indones.J.electronic.electromed.med.inf, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 59-64, Feb. 2024.
Section
Research Article