A Modified Electrosurgery Unit Based on High Frequency Design with Monopolar and Bipolar Method

  • Edo Rafsanzani Department of electromedical engineering, Poltekkes Kemenkes Surabaya
  • Tri Bowo Indrato Department of Electromedical Engineering, Poltekkes Kemenkes Surabaya
  • Andjar Pudji Department of Electromedical Engineering, Poltekkes Kemenkes Surabaya
  • Shengjie Yan School of Medical Instrumentation and Food Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China
  • Sergey A. Bogavev R&D Center of Medical Engineering under the Novosibirsk State Technical University, Novosibirsk, Russia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.35882/ijeeemi.v3i4.1
Keywords: Electrosurgey, Frequency, Power, Microcontroller

Abstract

Electrosurgery Unit is some machine to human body surgery. Electrosurgery Unit is uses a high frequency to human body tissue surgery, that causes blood who came out can be dicrease during surgery. When using a conventional scalpel is something that is highly avoided because it will cause contraindications to lack of blood which will be very dangerous for the patient. The purpose of this study is to design a tool that is used to replace a conventional scalpel with a tool that utilizes high frequency (400 KHz) generated by the oscillator circuit. In this study. The researches used Monopolar method and used two modes Cutting and Coagulation in order to eliminate faradic effects on body tissues causes high frequency, there is the high frequency will be adjusted to the duty cycle which aims to obtain various types of surgery required by doctor which is cutting 100% on and coagulation 6% on 94% off where is set it with arduino program. In this study, the researchers took advantage of the type of heat effect produced by high frequencies which were concentrated at one point so that it could be used to carry out the process of surgery  on body tissues so as to minimize the occurrence of large blood loss.  The result of this study is will be centered at one point on an object there is show up the depth difference of the cutting mode and the wide large difference of the coagulation mode. The module design resulted the power lowest at 300Ohm ESU Analyzer setting is 30Watt and the highest at 300Ohm setting too is 68Watt. The module design resulted the power lowest at 300Ohm ESU Analyzer setting is 30Watt and the highest at 300Ohm setting too is 68Watt at mode Cutting and the highest and lowest Coagulation mode using impedance setting the same there is 300 Ohm is constant 3Watt power result’s. The weaknesses at this research is the power still lower then the Electrosurgery Unit where is in the hospital. It can be fix for the next research using increase the final amplifier and maybe increase the frequency where is gonna make the voltage of the final amplifier be much better then this research

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

N. Aggarwal, K. Ahuja, N. Pal, R. Pannu, and V. Berwal, “Electrosurgery: Welcome Part of Modern Surgery A R T I C L E I N F O,” J. Appl. Dent. Med. Sci. NLM ID, vol. 3, no. 3037, pp. 2454–2288, 2017.

R. Fish and L. Geddes, “Educación Popular en la elaboración de materiales para capacitación en TICs para el desarrollo social,” ISSN:1937-5719, pp. 407–421, 2009.

S. T. Vedbhushan and M. A. Mulla, “Surgical Incision by High Frequency Cautery,” Assoc. Surg. India, p. 4, 2012, doi: 10.1007/s12262-012-0520-x.

K. Roby et al., “A novel electrocautery device to increase coagulation rate and reduce thermal damage,” 2011 IEEE 37th Annu. Northeast Bioeng. Conf. NEBEC 2011, no. 2, pp. 2–3, 2011, doi: 10.1109/NEBC.2011.5778527.

V. Dafinescu, V. David, and A. Tutuianu, “Electromagnetic emissions due to electrosurgery,” EPE 2012 - Proc. 2012 Int. Conf. Expo. Electr. Power Eng., vol. 20, no. Epe, pp. 525–528, 2012, doi: 10.1109/ICEPE.2012.6463880.

S. Yan, Y. Zhou, W. Xu, and C. Song, “An adaptive vessel closing generator in electrosurgery,” 2012 5th Int. Conf. Biomed. Eng. Informatics, BMEI 2012, no. Bmei, pp. 711–715, 2012, doi: 10.1109/BMEI.2012.6512999.

C. Bk, K. Kalaivani, T. Kalaiselvi, K. R. Sugashini, and B. Chinthamani, “Design of Improved Electrosurgical Unit with Pad Plate Design,” Int. J. Recent Technol. Eng., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 10706–10711, 2019, doi: 10.35940/ijrte.d4322.118419.

D. V. Palanker, A. Vankov, and P. Huie, “Electrosurgery with cellular precision,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 838–841, 2008, doi: 10.1109/TBME.2007.914539.

M. G. Munro, “The SAGES Manual on the Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy (FUSE),” IEEE Syst. J. 10.1007/978-1-4614-2074-3, p. 7, 2012, doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-2074-3.

D. E. Azagury, Book Review: The SAGES Manual on the Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy (FUSE), vol. 20, no. 3. 2013.

A. K. Ward, C. M. Ladtkow, and G. J. Collins, “Material removal mechanisms in monopolar electrosurgery,” Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. - Proc., pp. 1180–1183, 2007, doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2007.4352507.

W. M. Honig, “The Mecanism of cutting in Electrosurgery,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., no. January, pp. 58–62, 1975.

J. E. Sebben, “Cutting Current and Cutaneous,” dermatology Surg. Univ. Calif., vol. 1, pp. 29–32, 1988.

P. C. Benias and D. L. Carr-Locke, Principles of Electrosurgery, Third Edit. Elsevier Inc., 2019.

I. Alkatout, T. Schollmeyer, and N. A. Hawaldar, “Principles and Safety Measures of Electrosurgery in Laparoscopy,” Sci. Pap., no. I, pp. 130–139, 2012, doi: 10.4293/108680812X13291597716348.

S. H. A. M. chasen; A. M. Miller, “Electrosurgery Unit And Instrument,” United States Pat., p. 7, 1972.

A. Taheri, P. Mansoori, L. F. Sandoval, S. R. Feldman, D. Pearce, and P. M. Williford, “Electrosurgery: Part II. Technology, applications, and safety of electrosurgical devices,” J. Am. Acad. Dermatol., vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 607.e1-607.e12, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2013.09.055.

M. A. B. Faroby, H. G. Ariswati, T. Hamzah, and S. Luthfiyah, “Rancang Bangun Electrosurgery Unit (Pure Cut) Mode Bipolar,” J. Teknokes, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 36–40, 2019, doi: 10.35882/teknokes.v12i2.6.

K. Gallagher and J. Miles, “Electrosurgery,” 2010 ELsevier Ltd., no. 1, pp. 70–72, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.mpsur.2010.11.009.

R. E. Dodde, J. S. Gee, J. D. Geiger, and A. J. Shih, “Monopolar electrosurgical thermal management for minimizing tissue damage,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 167–173, 2012, doi: 10.1109/TBME.2011.2168956.

F. J. Pettersen, T. Martinsen, J. O. Høgetveit, and Ø. G. Martinsen, “Unintentional heating at implants when using electrosurgery,” Proc. Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. EMBS, vol. 2015-Novem, pp. 5805–5808, 2015, doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2015.7319711.

M. Ali Sajjadian; Glenn Isaacson, “ELECTROSURGERY IN THE HEAD AND NECK,” Departemenrt Otorhinolaryngol. Temple Univ. Childern’s Med. Cent., no. 107, pp. 254–261, 1998.

M. S. Tuleimat, “The Electrosurgery : - A Story of Controversies and Discrepancies,” IEEE - 2010 Int. Conf. Bioinforma. Biomed. Technol., pp. 356–359, 2010.

M. Albert, J. G. Webster, T. Medical, A. John, and J. Wiley, “Electrosurgical Generator And System,” United States Pat., no. 19, p. 20, 2000.

R. J. Podhajsky, K. D. Johnson, and J. Case, “System And Method For Otput Control Of Electrosurgical Generator,” Pat. Apl. Pyblication, vol. 1, no. 19, p. 8, 2009.

Published
2021-11-06
How to Cite
[1]
E. Rafsanzani, T. B. Indrato, A. Pudji, S. Yan, and S. A. Bogavev, “A Modified Electrosurgery Unit Based on High Frequency Design with Monopolar and Bipolar Method”, Indones.J.electronic.electromed.med.inf, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 128-132, Nov. 2021.
Issue
Vol. 3 No. 4 (2021): November
Section
Research Article

Copyright (c) 2021 Edo Rafsanzani, Tri Bowo Indrato, Andjar Pudji

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlikel 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0)  that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).